|
|
|
@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ type of the referent is shared knowledge, which is why adjusting that type in on
|
|
|
|
|
one place (the reference) can lead to issues. But if you shrink down a reference's
|
|
|
|
|
lifetime when you hand it to someone, that lifetime information isn't shared in
|
|
|
|
|
any way. There are now two independent references with independent lifetimes.
|
|
|
|
|
There's no way to mess with original reference's lifetime using the other one.
|
|
|
|
|
There's no way to mess with the original reference's lifetime using the other one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Or rather, the only way to mess with someone's lifetime is to build a meowing dog.
|
|
|
|
|
But as soon as you try to build a meowing dog, the lifetime should be wrapped up
|
|
|
|
|