|
|
@ -12,17 +12,29 @@ to have the same size. The ways to cause Undefined Behavior with this are mind
|
|
|
|
boggling.
|
|
|
|
boggling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* First and foremost, creating an instance of *any* type with an invalid state
|
|
|
|
* First and foremost, creating an instance of *any* type with an invalid state
|
|
|
|
is going to cause arbitrary chaos that can't really be predicted.
|
|
|
|
is going to cause arbitrary chaos that can't really be predicted. Do not
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
transmute `3` to `bool`. Even if you never *do* anything with the `bool`. Just
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
don't.
|
|
|
|
* Transmute has an overloaded return type. If you do not specify the return type
|
|
|
|
* Transmute has an overloaded return type. If you do not specify the return type
|
|
|
|
it may produce a surprising type to satisfy inference.
|
|
|
|
it may produce a surprising type to satisfy inference.
|
|
|
|
* Making a primitive with an invalid value is UB
|
|
|
|
* Transmuting an & to &mut is UB.
|
|
|
|
* Transmuting between non-repr(C) types is UB
|
|
|
|
* Transmuting an & to &mut is *always* UB.
|
|
|
|
* Transmuting an & to &mut is UB
|
|
|
|
* No you can't do it.
|
|
|
|
* Transmuting an & to &mut is *always* UB
|
|
|
|
* No you're not special.
|
|
|
|
* No you can't do it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* No you're not special
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Transmuting to a reference without an explicitly provided lifetime
|
|
|
|
* Transmuting to a reference without an explicitly provided lifetime
|
|
|
|
produces an [unbounded lifetime]
|
|
|
|
produces an [unbounded lifetime]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* When transmuting between different compound types, you have to make sure they
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
are laid out the same way! If layouts differ, the wrong fields are going to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
get filled with the wrong data, which will make you unhappy and can also be UB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(see above).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So how do you know if the layouts are the same? For `repr(C)` types and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`repr(transparent)` types, layout is precisely defined. But for your
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
run-of-the-mill `repr(Rust)`, it is not. Even different instances of the same
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
generic type can have wildly different layout. `Vec<i32>` and `Vec<u32>`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*might* have their fields in the same order, or they might not. The details of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what exactly is and is not guaranteed for data layout are still being worked
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
out over [at the UCG WG][ucg-layout].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[`mem::transmute_copy<T, U>`][transmute_copy] somehow manages to be *even more*
|
|
|
|
[`mem::transmute_copy<T, U>`][transmute_copy] somehow manages to be *even more*
|
|
|
|
wildly unsafe than this. It copies `size_of<U>` bytes out of an `&T` and
|
|
|
|
wildly unsafe than this. It copies `size_of<U>` bytes out of an `&T` and
|
|
|
@ -30,10 +42,12 @@ interprets them as a `U`. The size check that `mem::transmute` has is gone (as
|
|
|
|
it may be valid to copy out a prefix), though it is Undefined Behavior for `U`
|
|
|
|
it may be valid to copy out a prefix), though it is Undefined Behavior for `U`
|
|
|
|
to be larger than `T`.
|
|
|
|
to be larger than `T`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also of course you can get most of the functionality of these functions using
|
|
|
|
Also of course you can get all of the functionality of these functions using raw
|
|
|
|
pointer casts.
|
|
|
|
pointer casts or `union`s, but without any of the lints or other basic sanity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
checks. Raw pointer casts and `union`s do not magically avoid the above rules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[unbounded lifetime]: unbounded-lifetimes.html
|
|
|
|
[unbounded lifetime]: unbounded-lifetimes.html
|
|
|
|
[transmute]: ../std/mem/fn.transmute.html
|
|
|
|
[transmute]: ../std/mem/fn.transmute.html
|
|
|
|
[transmute_copy]: ../std/mem/fn.transmute_copy.html
|
|
|
|
[transmute_copy]: ../std/mem/fn.transmute_copy.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ucg-layout]: https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/layout.html
|
|
|
|